Anonymous
THE ACTUAL FUCK. I GOT AN ANON QUESTION JUST LIKE THAT, THE OTHER DAY. WEIRD

We either have the same weirdo anon or it’s a freaky spam xD

6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:52pm
Anonymous
I like pooping do u like pooping

Yeah I suppose it’s good for you. Good job anon.

6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:44pm
lanadelblu-ray:

therainssmallhands:

turntechstridercest:

jean-huh-kirschnickerdoodle:

doctorrivaille:


sb5ive:

rapunzelie:

new undies: cute stretchmarks: also cute

No no no and NO stretch marks are never cute!! wtf too lazy to go get some cocoa butter and use it daily? We all have stretch marks but we can get rid of it.. People should take care of themselves and if cocoa butter didnt work for you make an appointment for a laser stretch mark removal dont be a lazy ass


all stretch marks are beautiful no exceptions 

stretch marks are perfectly fine and natural and beautiful, free lightning bolt tattoos yo
cocoa butter is a preventative that does not always work, and smells and stains clothes and oh yeah, since a lot of people get stretch marks just from growing NOT from weight, theyd have to slather their whole body and no one really wants to do that or smell like that so strongly.
laser treatment? really? you want people to pay $1000+/appt (usually takes a few treatments) to get rid of something perfectly natural because you’ve named yourself standard of the fucking world and think we all live to please you? most people dont have that money and if they do thats not what they want to spend it on.
also fuck you.

I usually don’t reblog ladies in undies, but for real. Don’t fuckin’ knock people over stretchmarks, or anything on their bodies for that matter. I’ve been underweight all my life and have them from growing. They happen. The just do. 

FREE LIGHTNING TATTOOS

You’ve earned your beautiful stripes, you fine ass tiger.

lanadelblu-ray:

therainssmallhands:

turntechstridercest:

jean-huh-kirschnickerdoodle:

doctorrivaille:

sb5ive:

rapunzelie:

new undies: cute
stretchmarks: also cute

No no no and NO stretch marks are never cute!! wtf too lazy to go get some cocoa butter and use it daily? We all have stretch marks but we can get rid of it.. People should take care of themselves and if cocoa butter didnt work for you make an appointment for a laser stretch mark removal dont be a lazy ass

all stretch marks are beautiful no exceptions 

  1. stretch marks are perfectly fine and natural and beautiful, free lightning bolt tattoos yo
  2. cocoa butter is a preventative that does not always work, and smells and stains clothes and oh yeah, since a lot of people get stretch marks just from growing NOT from weight, theyd have to slather their whole body and no one really wants to do that or smell like that so strongly.
  3. laser treatment? really? you want people to pay $1000+/appt (usually takes a few treatments) to get rid of something perfectly natural because you’ve named yourself standard of the fucking world and think we all live to please you? most people dont have that money and if they do thats not what they want to spend it on.
  4. also fuck you.

I usually don’t reblog ladies in undies, but for real. Don’t fuckin’ knock people over stretchmarks, or anything on their bodies for that matter. I’ve been underweight all my life and have them from growing. They happen. The just do. 

FREE LIGHTNING TATTOOS

You’ve earned your beautiful stripes, you fine ass tiger.

via  bearmang  (originally  rapunzelie)
6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:22pm 241,517 notes

rosewong:

My boyfriend and I went on a hunt today for a New York Times paper to see my first printed editorial illustration! Whooooooo! Thanks NYT and AD Minh Uong!

You can read the article here! (~it’s a good read~)

via  d3ssins  (originally  rosewong)
6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:20pm 361 notes
I am better than I was.
I will be better than I am.
~ (140/365) by (DS)
via  tommyypickless  (originally  little-miss-tragedy)
6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:12pm 210,064 notes

Pin Ups - Color Slides (1950’s / 1960’s)

via  thatfireflower  (originally  kdo)
6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:10pm 371 notes
brutalgeneration:

extricate (by Mahin Fayaz)

brutalgeneration:

extricate (by Mahin Fayaz)

via  brutalgeneration  (originally  brutalgeneration)
6 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 3:07pm 1,172 notes
If only I cared enough to do my makeup every day

If only I cared enough to do my makeup every day

tags   selfie  
8 hours ago on 14 September 2014 ~ 1:40pm 3 notes
via  lost-inlust  (originally  adrieldaniel)
1 day ago on 13 September 2014 ~ 9:53pm 9,965 notes
via  toast-to-the-future-kids  (originally  hotwinger)
1 day ago on 13 September 2014 ~ 12:38pm 121,852 notes

trickbit:

vespertinavi:

My favorite Stephen Gammell illustrations from ‘Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark’.

Stephen Gammell was probably my biggest inspiration growing up, one of them anyway. 

via  hes-no-good-to-me-dead  (originally  vespertinavi)
1 day ago on 13 September 2014 ~ 1:14am 107,954 notes
via  quasar-queen  (originally  brotherwife)
1 day ago on 13 September 2014 ~ 1:10am 50,789 notes
bluesrat:

sameatschildren:

fitguyphil:

goddnessoffitblr:

fitguyphil:

fatasstofit:

1234marinescorps:

sheetsf0r-states:

liberals-are-so-strange:

My cousin is being deployed, and this is my favorite photo he’s sent me so far. She won….

I love this.

This is my new role model lol

Now try and tell me women are too weak to serve on the front lines

It’s not about being physically weak.

What the hell does that even mean

Exactly what it says?

Right. Women are mentally weak. All the time. Every woman. OK.

It’s not about weakness.  No one but calcified misogynists who refuse to do their research field that argument these days.  It’s not about women at all.  It’s about men, and the idea that they’ll find women ‘distracting.’ 
Discovery News:

The former senator from Pennsylvania [Rick Santorum] was concerned that male soldiers would just want to protect fellow women soldiers during a fight, explaining, “when see a woman in harm’s way…It’s natural. It’s very much in our culture to be protective.”
There are also concerns that women will interfere with group bonding and cohesion – the same arguments that long interfered with the integration of African Americans and gay people into the military.

This Forbes article features the Pentagon’s own reason: “According to a press release, “the department recognizes there are practical barriers that require time to resolve to ensure the services maximize the safety and privacy of all service members while maintaining military readiness.””
In other words, the reason has nothing to do with women having shortcomings.  It’s just that organizationally the military is not prepared to accommodate women.  What kind of accommodations, you ask? Things like medical staff trained to handle gynecological problems, body armor that actually fits them, and enforcement of laws and policies to effectively protect women from sexual harassment and assault by their own fellow servicemen.
There’s also the fact that women have been serving in combat for the entire history of the US.  They just haven’t been serving in official capacities, which means they get all the fun of risking their lives and none of the recognition.  Furthermore, with the style of warfare changing, the concept of ‘front lines’ is becoming outmoded.  When you are fighting against guerilla opponents, who may be in front of, behind, or to the side of you, you’re on the ‘front lines’ so long as you’re anywhere in the war zone.
Finally, there’s, oh yeah!  The fact that if you do happen to believe women are somehow ‘too weak,’ well it sucks to be you, because the Pentagon lifted the ban on women in combat at the beginning of 2013 and is working to have the military services ready to begin actively accepting women in combat roles by 2016.  The Marines began testing integration scenarios early this year.
If you’re concerned that men won’t accept women in combat roles, or men will assault female soldiers, or men will get distracted when women are hurt—I submit to you that that is a problem with men in combat.  If men can’t control their emotions enough to keep their dicks in their pants or their act together in the face of fellow soldiers being shot at, then they need additional training before they’re allowed to handle machine guns and bombs.
And not to put words in his mouth, but I suspect the gentleman in the OP’s lovely photo would agree.

bluesrat:

sameatschildren:

fitguyphil:

goddnessoffitblr:

fitguyphil:

fatasstofit:

1234marinescorps:

sheetsf0r-states:

liberals-are-so-strange:

My cousin is being deployed, and this is my favorite photo he’s sent me so far. She won….

I love this.

This is my new role model lol

Now try and tell me women are too weak to serve on the front lines

It’s not about being physically weak.

What the hell does that even mean

Exactly what it says?

Right. Women are mentally weak. All the time. Every woman. OK.

It’s not about weakness.  No one but calcified misogynists who refuse to do their research field that argument these days.  It’s not about women at all.  It’s about men, and the idea that they’ll find women ‘distracting.’ 

Discovery News:

The former senator from Pennsylvania [Rick Santorum] was concerned that male soldiers would just want to protect fellow women soldiers during a fight, explaining, “when see a woman in harm’s way…It’s natural. It’s very much in our culture to be protective.”

There are also concerns that women will interfere with group bonding and cohesion – the same arguments that long interfered with the integration of African Americans and gay people into the military.

This Forbes article features the Pentagon’s own reason: “According to a press release, “the department recognizes there are practical barriers that require time to resolve to ensure the services maximize the safety and privacy of all service members while maintaining military readiness.””

In other words, the reason has nothing to do with women having shortcomings.  It’s just that organizationally the military is not prepared to accommodate women.  What kind of accommodations, you ask? Things like medical staff trained to handle gynecological problems, body armor that actually fits them, and enforcement of laws and policies to effectively protect women from sexual harassment and assault by their own fellow servicemen.

There’s also the fact that women have been serving in combat for the entire history of the US.  They just haven’t been serving in official capacities, which means they get all the fun of risking their lives and none of the recognition.  Furthermore, with the style of warfare changing, the concept of ‘front lines’ is becoming outmoded.  When you are fighting against guerilla opponents, who may be in front of, behind, or to the side of you, you’re on the ‘front lines’ so long as you’re anywhere in the war zone.

Finally, there’s, oh yeah!  The fact that if you do happen to believe women are somehow ‘too weak,’ well it sucks to be you, because the Pentagon lifted the ban on women in combat at the beginning of 2013 and is working to have the military services ready to begin actively accepting women in combat roles by 2016The Marines began testing integration scenarios early this year.

If you’re concerned that men won’t accept women in combat roles, or men will assault female soldiers, or men will get distracted when women are hurt—I submit to you that that is a problem with men in combat.  If men can’t control their emotions enough to keep their dicks in their pants or their act together in the face of fellow soldiers being shot at, then they need additional training before they’re allowed to handle machine guns and bombs.

And not to put words in his mouth, but I suspect the gentleman in the OP’s lovely photo would agree.

1 day ago on 13 September 2014 ~ 1:09am 38,006 notes
clubyonkidecaballeros:

trip to the forest
via  sensuwal  (originally  clubyonkidecaballeros)
2 days ago on 12 September 2014 ~ 2:16pm 12,799 notes

I’m so fucking excited for Halloween!

2 days ago on 12 September 2014 ~ 2:08pm